GCJAC Annual Report 2020-2021

300 W. Washington St. Greensboro NC 27401 336-373-2295

2020-2021 Annual Report

INDEX

ABOUT THE COMMISSION

Greensboro Criminal Justice Advisory Commission (GCJAC) was established on August 15, 2018. Its mission is to provide impartial oversight of GPD conduct, practices, and policies to enhance accountability, inform the public to increase transparency, and create sustainable partnerships throughout the community. GCJAC, and its subcommittee, the Police Community Review Board (PCRB), operate as an autonomous entity providing education, advisory and oversight functions concerning criminal justice issues within the city. At the same time, they report on their work to, and are funded by, the City of Greensboro. The GCJAC and PCRB function as the result of State of NC Session Law 2018-105, authorizing disclosure of information regarding law enforcement in Greensboro’s criminal justice system (primarily the GPD). Neither the commission’s funding nor its management overlap with GPD. No employee of the GCJAC is an employee of the GPD. The GCJAC is a City commission nominated by its executive committee and includes residents representing the demographic diversity and makeup of the five City Council districts. All members are appointed by the mayor and confirmed by City Council. Roles & Responsibilities • Monitor, review, and evaluate criminal justice data across City. • Review criminal justice concerns throughout Greensboro and identify trends, systemic issues and specific instances in which law enforcement may not meet needs of the City. • Provide recommendations to City and the GPD on how to address issues. • Work with City and GPD on recommendations and community follow-up. • Serve as a primary community education and outreach resource for criminal justice subjects. • Prepare and provide semi-annual updates and annual report of findings. • House the PCRB subcommittee to facilitate civilian review of police complaints and GPD disciplinary process determinations.

About the Commission..... 3 Meet the Commissioners.................... 4 Message from the Criminal Justice Administrator....................... 5 Message from the Commission Chair............... 6 Activities and Achievements. ..................... 7 Policy Reviews & Recommendations............. 8 Policy Subcommittee..................... 9 Outreach Subcommittee .................... 9 Education Subcommittee...................10 Police Community Review Board .....................11 GPD 2020 Complaints Review...........12 Directive Violations. .........13 Alleged Directive Violations.............................14 For More Information......15

Meetings GCJAC meets every third Thursday of the month unless otherwise noted. These meetings are open to the public.

MISSION AND VISION

GCJAC’s mission is to review, monitor and study how Greensboro conducts law enforcement across the justice continuum. This includes assessing gaps, identifying challenges, and advocating for issues (through forums, seminars, workshops, studies, and reports) about law enforcement within the city, especially involving criminal justice policies affecting the public.

The vision of the GCJAC is to provide the Greensboro community with an objective civilian body promoting better oversight of law enforcement practices in Greensboro. In so doing, the commission also conveys information to the residents about that oversight.

3

MEET THE COMMISSIONERS

Darrell “Jaye”Webb Chair Executive Board Member, District 1 Webb has been a member of the Greensboro community since 1989. Currently, he is the program director for

Tom Phillips Executive Board Member, Police Community Review Board Chair, District 3 Phillips has lived in Greensboro since 1975. He retired from Merrill Lynch

Nancy Vaughan Mayor Yvonne Johnson Mayor Pro Tem Marikay Abuzuaiter At-Large Michelle Kennedy At-Large Sharon Hightower District 1 Goldie F. Wells District 2 Justin Outling District 3 Nancy Hoffmann District 4 Tammi Thurm District 5 GREENSBORO CITY COUNCIL CITY LEADERSHIP Chris Wilson Interim City Manager Trey Davis Assistant City Manager, Office of Public Safety Administrator, National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, Training and Development Committee Member Latisha McNeil Criminal Justice

the Family Success Center at Guilford Child Development Webb has volunteered with the UnitedWay of Greater Greensboro in various positions, and has remained conscious of the issues and concerns of the community. He works to empower those who believe they have no voice. His life’s mission is to uplift, assist, and provide opportunity for all.

in 2011, where he was a financial advisor for 35 years. He served the community in a variety of ways. In addition to his membership on the GCJAC, he is also a director of the Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority. Phillips also served on the Greensboro City Council for 12 years as a District 3 and an at-large council member.

Kay Brown Executive Board Member, Policy Subcommittee Chair, District 2

Steve Friedland District 4

Friedland is a senior scholar, professor of law and Jennings Fellow at Elon University School of Law. He is a former assistant US attorney for the

Brown is a field manager and community advocate and organizer. She has a master’s in business administration and bachelor’s in

journalism and mass communications. She serves as Greensboro NAACP second vice president, and on various Greensboro committees and boards. She supports economic justice and police accountability, and spends her time supporting and leading within grassroots organizations. Her background includes trade school admissions, business management, operations and development, and case management.

District of Columbia and has taught criminal law at Elon and Wake Forest Law schools. He holds a juris doctorate from Harvard Law School and a master’s and doctorate in law from Columbia University.

Consuela “Connie” Brown Outreach Subcommittee Chair, District 2 Brown received a bachelor’s degree in social work from Bennett College, a Master of Science in Education from

Franca Jalloh Education Subcommittee Chair, District 5 Jalloh, a mother of three beautiful daughters and the founder and executive director of Jalloh’s Upright

NC Agricultural and Technical State University, and a Master of Science in social work from Simmons University. She is a licensed clinical social worker associate. Brown has 20 years of experience working in both the mental health and social work fields, with many years of training related to trauma and crisis experiences.

Services of NC, a nonprofit organization that serves low-income immigrants and refugees. Jalloh represents the international population, as she is an immigrant who was born in Sierra Leone, West Africa, grew up in Brunei, Southeast Asia, for about 10 years, and lived in the US for about 20 years.

D.J. O’Brien District 4

Nadine Malpass District 5

O’Brien is a partner at the law firm of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard LLP in Greensboro. His practice is concentrated in corporate litigation and

Malpass is a senior vice president of resource development at the United Way of Greater Greensboro. She manages and provides direct oversight

employment law. O’Brien is a graduate of Vanderbilt University and theWake Forest University School of Law. He, his wife, and his two children live in Greensboro.

to the Resource Development Department, serving as the senior leader and primary donor relationship manager.

Quentin Brown District 1 No bio available.

4

MESSAGE FROM THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATOR

It is my privilege to present the 2020-21 annual report for GCJAC. Even throughout a global pandemic, the commission continued to strive to be data-driven, community focused and action oriented. Since August 15, 2018, when GCJAC was formally established by City ordinance, we have worked diligently to fulfill our mission to provide impartial oversight, increase transparency, and create sustainable community partnerships. I could not be more pleased with what this group of commissioners has accomplished and thankful for the continued support from City management, the City Council, and our community. Civilian oversight is crucial to maintaining a balance between the need for public safety and the rights of individuals who interact with police. Over the last three years, the commission has worked to carry out its mission and purpose to monitor, review, analyze, educate, advise, and report. Commissioners have taken a holistic approach to oversight that prioritizes communication, collaboration, and a more robust commitment to accountability. This new approach reflects the culture and beliefs of our diverse Greensboro community. The GCJAC has recognized that civilian oversight cannot and should not be limited to just investigations of police misconduct. Effective oversight and improvements in policing must be coupled with data, research, and community input. These areas are necessary for positive and sustainable change that benefits both our community and the police department. It is my honor to serve as the Criminal Justice Administrator of the GCJAC, and I am humbled by the group’s commitment to this challenging work, tenacity, and passion. This report highlights our team’s achievements and accomplishments. Cities and municipalities from across the country have contacted me about GCJAC’s work and possibly modeling its oversight in their respective communities. I am so proud that GCJAC can be proof that effective civilian police oversight can lead to systemic change.

Latisha McNeil, MS, Certified Practitioner of Oversight Criminal Justice Administrator, City of Greensboro

5

MESSAGE FROM THE COMMISSION CHAIR

As I write this, we as a community are emerging from unprecedented times. As the global pandemic shook our nation to its core and senseless murders continue to rob us of the peace and justice for all we seek. As a commission, we have met virtually since May 2020, and many of us have not seen each other in person since well before then. Yet, the fiscal year of 2020-21 has taught us not to take anything for granted. The summer of 2020 also made us uncomfortable — for the better. The murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers forced the world to look in the mirror. Yet again, we recognize the fatal consequences of the entrenched racial caste system that allows space for groups of people to be treated in inhumane ways with little regard for consequences. As many took to the streets to demand accountability and justice for Black Americans killed by police violence, the GCJAC also stepped up to contribute to the cause by providing a platform for healthy dialogue and solution-based discussion. The Greensboro Police Department (GPD) was at the table to hear the conversations. It was not always easy to hear, but they stayed and listened. In October 2020, the GCJAC decided to centralize its efforts around the theme of “Bridging the Gap.” Since that time, I would like to report that the commission’s focus has been doing just that. We have been intentional in providing a space where community voices and policing practices can be reviewed to make data- informed, solid recommendations for change. The mission of the GCJAC is to monitor, review, analyze, educate, advise and report on criminal justice issues that affect all of Greensboro. As we continue with our mission, the GCJAC will continue to provide educational forums and outreach to the communities we serve. The GCJAC is also committed to amplifying community voice through its continued commitment to focus on transparency and accountability within the GPD. We thank the Greensboro City Council and the community for the opportunity to serve and we are looking forward to many positive changes in the future.

JayeWebb Greensboro Criminal Justice Advisory Commission Chair

6

ACTIVITIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS

GCJAC is committed to continuing excellent work and increasing transparency and accountability. The past two years have demonstrated that this work will continue to require GCJAC to build and expand while maintaining a solid foundation in the community. GCJAC continues to seek and implement opportunities for improvement to achieve our mission.

Providing Impartial Oversight to Enhance Accountability

• Worked to provide impartial oversight of GPD to enhance accountability by improving on and creating new standards. • Ensured that community complaints were processed promptly and subsequent investigations by GPD were conducted thoroughly and fairly.

• Received reports on external complaints processed by GPD’s professional standards division. • Sent formal recommendations for policy changes to GPD and City Council. • Highlighted issues that arose from the community about GPD’s consent to search policy and challenged GPD’s current policy about illegal marijuana versus legal hemp. • Worked with the City Manager’s Office and GPD to revise the police’s current policy on bias- based policing.

Informing the Public to Increase Transparency • Released a statement in the wake of the George Floyd murder.

• Hosted two community–wide town halls on June 16 and 26, 2020. These gave an opportunity for community concerns to be discussed and gave GPD Chief Brian James the opportunity to discuss policy changes as a result of national

initiatives such as former President Barack Obama’s 21st Century Policing and “8 Can’t Wait.” These police policy initiatives call for things like bans on chokeholds and shooting into moving cars, mandating warnings before shooting, and training on de-escalation, among others. • Collaborated with GPD to host community educational forums on understanding the complaint process and body worn cameras.

Creating Sustainable Partnerships • Continued to focus on building and nurturing partnerships in a way that prioritized equity, empathy, and direct connection. • Made significant changes to its website and written materials to improve ease of access and address issues like language and digital access barriers.

• Created a GCJAC informational brochure in six languages, conducted user-accessibility testing for the GCJAC website, and ensured the GCJAC website was mobile-friendly and searchable.

7

POLICY REVIEWS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Written Consent to Search Due to concern from the community about written consent for police searches, the GCJAC reviewed the current GPD consent to search policy as well as policies from other comparative cities across NC. The GCJAC found in January 2020 that GPD has a very comprehensive policy, however there where changes that could be made to enhance the policy. A recommendation (see link to full report on page 15) was submitted to City Council in February 2020 outlining three suggested changes to the policy: • The consent search form should prioritize that consent is voluntary. • There should be an addition to the form to include withdrawal of consent. • Officers should read the consent to search form to people prior to having them sign. • In July 2020, the GCJAC made a motion to reaffirm their recommendations on consent searches to City Council. In September 2020, GPD modified Departmental Directive 12.5.1: Consent Search to include Informed Documented Consent Searches to say, “In all instances, officers shall inform the person from whom consent is sought that consent to search is voluntary, they have the right to refuse consent, and they have the right to withdraw consent at any time during the search.”This informed consent to search is to be captured by the officer’s body worn camera. Marijuana Versus Hemp In October 2020, the GCJAC began looking at data from the GPD on citations, arrest and searches that stemmed from the suspicion of marijuana possession. The data confirmed disparities relating to gender and race. The commission researched state laws across the US and followed NC’s proposed laws about marijuana and hemp.

After receiving a report from the NC State Bureau of Investigations that hemp and marijuana were indistinguishable in field tests, the GCJAC made recommendations to the City Council and GPD that marijuana should be de-prioritized in the City of Greensboro. (See see link to full report on page 15). Bias-Based Policing The City Manager’s Office and GPD asked the GCJAC to review purposed changes to the GPD policy on bias-based policing. The commission’s objective was to review current and purposed changes to the policy and compare it with others across the country. After reviewing polices of many different police agencies, the GCJAC submitted its recommendations to the City Manager’s Office on December 2020.

8

GCJAC SUBCOMMITTEES As the GCJAC continued to fulfill its goals for FY 2020-21, it became clear that more subcommittees needed to be formed to handle the breadth of work that the commission has been tasked with completing. In June 2020, Chair Webb asked members to volunteer to work on the three subcommittees listed below. (The PCRB subcommittee was established by City ordinance at the inception of the GCJAC). The focus of the subcommittees was to ensure that commissioners were able to dedicate time to developing each of the goals of the commission.

POLICY SUBCOMMITTEE The GCJAC policy subcommittee is responsible for drafting policy recommendations for the commission. The subcommittee conducts rigorous reviews of academic, legal, quantitative, and qualitative research to: • Recommend policy and training changes within GPD. • Report clear and reliable information about GPD data and other areas of public concern. • Object to GPD practices that negatively impact transparency, accountability, or fairness. The subcommittee believes that excellent policy is created with equal attention to research, formulation, and implementation. Additionally, it works to ensure an open line of communication between policymakers and the individuals or groups affected by those policies. Research and analysis are critical to GCJAC’s mission to enhance accountability and increase transparency. This subcommittee reports on the issues that most impact community members’ interactions with GPD. In some cases, these reports are based on patterns or trends that GCJAC has observed while processing and monitoring complaints. In other cases, these reports are written in response to specific direction from City Council or the City Manager’s Office. OUTREACH SUBCOMMITTEE The GCJAC outreach subcommittee works to engage the community to prioritize equity, empathy, and direct connection. During the past year, the world has been essentially virtual. With no in-person, events to attend due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the outreach committee relied on the members participations in virtual community events. Commission members attended meetings of various civic, nonprofit and community organizations to spread awareness to the mission and scope of the GCJAC. All commissioners received a GCJAC PowerPoint that will allow them to all provide consistent information about the commission to the community. The outreach subcommittee hopes to increase its engagement with the community by hosting events, building partnerships with community organizations, increasing language access, and publishing accessible information about policing. The subcommittee is focused on increasing the visibility of the commission by attending more community events and passing out GCJAC literature about how to file a complaint and understanding your rights during police interactions.

SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Kay Brown Chair Tom Phillips JayeWebb Quentin Brown Franca Jalloh Nadine Malpass D.J. O’Brien

SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Connie Brown Chair Franca Jalloh Nadine Malpass JayeWebb

9

GCJAC SUBCOMMITTEES

EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE Educating the community on issues throughout the criminal justice continuum is one of the cornerstones of the GCJAC. The education subcommittee is responsible for providing forums where the community can receive data-informed, fact-filled information on policing in the City of Greensboro. Community members are able to hear information directly from policymakers and others with accurate information on issues affecting the community. During fiscal year 2020-21, the education subcommittee presented two forums. A session on understanding the complaint process was held on December 3 during this forum, attendees learned from GPD’s professional standards division how an external complaint is received and investigated by their office. The presenter walked the audience through the entire complaint process and answered questions the how the department keeps that complainant informed and what options they have if they are not satisfied with the resolution of the complaint. On April 28, the subcommittee presented a forum demystifying body worn cameras. During this forum, the attendees received a presentation on body worm camera used by the GPD. Questions were answered on the type of camera, the amount of data each camera can hold, how the videos are stored on a cloud-bases systems and when officers are required to activate their cameras. These events were attend by more than 50 residents. The subcommittee is currently planning additional forums on understanding your rights and trauma-informed care and research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACES). Language access is a priority for the GCJAC education subcommittee. The education subcommittee worked hard to ensure information about how to file a complaint was accessible to the community in six most common languages spoken in Greensboro: Arabic, English, French, Khmer, Spanish and Rhade. The information is on the GCJAC the webpage. The education subcommittee is currently working to develop a “Know Your Rights” brochure to educate community members on their rights during police encounters.

SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Franca Jalloh Chair Connie Brown Steve Friedland Nadine Malpass JayeWebb

10

GCJAC SUBCOMMITTEES

POLICE COMMUNITY REVIEW BOARD (PCRB) The purpose of the PCRB is to determine whether GPD officers conducted themselves according to established department directives. The PCRB’s goal is to provide positive advisory determinations and/or recommendations of how residents are treated in interactions with officers and how that can improve in the future. PCRB does not conduct investigations but does review how GPD handles complaints and how opinions based upon those reviews are managed. The PCRB will not make administrative determinations or recommendations on individual personnel matters of sworn members of the GPD. All complaints against police officers are first investigated by the police department’s Professional Standards Division. If individuals do not agree with the division’s outcome, they are offered an option to have their complaints presented to a certified City-contracted mediator. If they do not choose that option, they are eligible to refer their complaint to PCRB. The PCRB can make the following types of determinations about a complaint: • It can sustain the complaint if PCRB agrees with GPD’s Professional Standards Division. • If PCRB disagrees with the Professional Standards Division’s findings, PCRB may schedule a conference with the chief of police to resolve the disagreement. • If no resolution or a partial resolution is achieved with the chief of police, PCRB will request in writing that the City Manager review the case and make a final decision on all unresolved issues. During FY 2020-21, the PCRB received three requests for review of disposition from complainants who were not satisfied with reviews conducted by GPD’s Professional Standards Division.

SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS

Tom Phillips Chair

Kay Brown JayeWebb Quentin Brown Franca Jalloh Nadine Malpass D.J. O’Brien

Date Complaint Received

PCRB Review Date

Outcome

08/26/2020

10/02/2020 Agreed with Professional Standards Division.

08/04/2020

10/02/2020 Agreed with Professional Standards Division. 12/15/2020 Disagreed with GPD. Referred to City Manager.

10/29/2020

11

GPD 2020 COMPLAINTS REVIEW

The Professional Standards Division provides the GCJAC with monthly data on external complaints – those filed against police officers by members of the public -- for its review and analysis. The following information is from calendar year 2020, and does not include internal complaints, those files against police by other employees. TRENDS IDENTIFIED

• GPD received 152 complaints from the public for 70 separate incidents from January 1 to December 31, 2020. For contest, GPD has 358 officers working on patrol that year and the department responded to 250,766 calls for service. These number do not include special teams officers. • The average number of days between complaint date received and complaint date completed was approximately 67 days in 2020. • Most of the external complaints received in 2020 were for Directive 1.5.2 (A1) - Courtesy Toward the Public. GCJAC will review whether GPD should update its policies regarding courtesy.

YEAR 2020 TOTAL EXTERNAL COMPLAINTS

SUSTAINED 62

34

UNFOUNDED

The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to prove the allegation made in the complaint. The standard of proof to sustain an allegation is defined as preponderance of the evidence, a much lower standard than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

The allegation is false, or the employee could not have committed the violation.

21

15

NOT SUSTAINED

EXONERATED

The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation made in the complaint.

The acts that provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred, however, the investigation revealed that they were justified, lawful and proper.

There are 10 external complaints still pending from 2020.

12

DIRECTIVE VIOLATIONS

In 2020, members of the public filed complaints that police department employees violated the following GPD Directives, rules that govern how police officers perform their duties:

• Arrest, Search, and Seizure – Abide by the law and procedure (1.5.34 A and B) Officers will not make any arrest, search or seizure, which they know, or should know, is not in accordance with the law and GPD procedure. Employees will not initiate any action, or fail to provide any service as a result of personal bias or stereotype, as described in Departmental Directive 1.8. • BodyWorn Cameras – OfficersWill Activate and Utilize Per Policy (1.5.38 A) • Compliance to Laws and Regulations Duty Responsibilities – Biased Based (1.5.4 A) Employees will not commit any acts or make any omissions, which constitute a violation of any of the rules, policies, procedures, special orders, or other directives of the GPD. • Courtesy Toward the Public (1.5.2 A) Employees will be courteous and tactful in the performance of their duties or while representing themselves as members of the GPD. In performing their duties, employees will not express any prejudice concerning race, religion, national origin, sex, or other personal characteristics. • Driving (1.5.20 A) Employees will obey all traffic laws while driving under normal conditions and will drive with due regard for the safety of others. • Duty Responsibilities – Biased Based (1.5.12 K) • Duty Responsibilities – Take Appropriate Action (1.5.12 E) All employees will take any action that is required or is responsible and appropriate in connection with the performance of their assigned duties • General Conduct (1.5.1) Employees will conduct their private and professional lives in a manner that does not hinder the department’s efforts to achieve its goals, violate its policies or bring discredit upon the department or any employee of the department.

• Proper Identification –Will Supply Name/ Badge Number (1.5.19 B) All employees, whether uniformed or plain clothed, will identify themselves verbally and by displaying their badge or identification card. • Responsibility for Safety and Security of Persons and Private Property (1.5.14) Employees shall ensure that reasonable measures are taken to provide safety, protection and security for persons and property coming under their care and control because of arrest or other police action. • Submission of Reports – Reports will be accurate and complete (1.5.22 A and B) Employees will submit all necessary reports and records, in accordance with the established GPD procedure, prior to the end of their duty day unless directed otherwise by a supervisor. Reports and records submitted by employees will be accurate and complete. • Truthfulness (1.5.3 A) Employees will be truthful when making any statements(s) in connection with their performance of official duties, whether or not under oath. • Use of Force (1.5.13 A and B) Officers will use no more force than necessary in the performance of their duties and will then do so only in accordance with GPD procedures and the law. Officers will comply with GPD procedures concerning the documentation and investigation of the use of physical force.

13

ALLEGED DIRECTIVE VIOLATIONS

Not Sustained

Not Sustained

Exonerated

Unfounded

Sustained

Total

Abuse of Position - Using Position for Personal Gain/Privileges Arrest, Search, and Seizure - Abide by Law and Procedure

1

1

23

4

4

5

8

2

13

8

5

Arrest, Search, and Seizure - Bias Based

Body Worn Cameras - Officers Will Activate and Utilize Per Policy

8

2

6

31

8

5

16

2

Courtesy Toward the Public

1

1

Courtesy Toward Employees - Bias Based

3

2

1

Courtesy Toward the Public - Bias Based

Compliance to Laws & Regulations - Violate Policies; Evidence Handling

9

1

8

5

1

2

2

Compliance to Laws & Regulations - Obey All Laws

6

2

3

1

Discretion - Good Judgement

4

2

1

1

Duty Responsibilities - Biased Based

1

1

Duty Responsibilities - Personal Business on Duty

20

3

4

11

2

Duty Responsibilities - Take Appropriate Action

8

2

5

1

General Conduct

1

1

Malicious Criticism and/or Gossip

Proper Identification - Supply Name/Number of Supervisor Proper Identification - Will Supply Name/Badge Number Release of Information - GPD Official Business is Confidential Reporting for Duty - Properly Equipped/Prepared for Duty Responsibility for Safety & Security of Persons & Private Property Submission of Reports - Reports Will Be Accurate and Complete Submission of Reports - Submit All Reports/Records by End of Shift Use of Departmental Equipment - Use for Intended Purpose (Division Level) Use of Force - Documentation/Investigation of Force

3

1

2

4

2

2

1

1

1

1

3

3

4

1

2

1

5

1

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

Use of Force - Use No More Force Than Necessary

14

FOR MORE INFORMATION VIDEOS

Understanding the GPD Complaint Process Video www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJACvideos

PUBLICATIONS

GCJAC Information Card Arabic www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJAC_Arabic English www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJACEnglish French www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJAC_French Khmer www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJAC_Khmer Rhade www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJAC_Rhade Spanish www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJAC_Spanish

LETTERS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Chair Webb Letter 06/01/2020 www.greensboro-nc.gov/GCJACchairletter

Consent to Search Policy Recommendation 07/20/2020 www.greensboro-nc.gov/ConsentToSearch

Hemp Versus Marijuana Recommendation www.greensboro-nc.gov/Hemp

15

300 W. Washington St. Greensboro NC 27401 336-373-2295