Adopted Budget Projected Budget 2016-2017

Infrastructure - Greensboro Department of Transportation

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

Actual

Budget

Adopted

Projected

Workload Measures  Number of High Accident Locations studied  Number of Streetlights inspected along major travel corridors

48 40

45

45

5,450

5,400

5,400

5,400

 Number of linear feet of new sidewalk installed

30,505

15,000

15,000

15,000

 Number of plan reviews conducted

899

850

900

900

 Number of special events requiring Transportation maintenance services

121 75

120

120

Efficiency Measures  Average cost per plan review

$243

$240

$240

$235

Effectiveness Measure  Percent of GDOT workorders completed on time  Percent of GDOT maintenance completed on schedule  Percent Public Information Requests completed within 2 days

90%

90%

92%

93%

85%

95%

92%

92%

77%

85%

85%

85%

BUDGET SUMMARY

2014-15

2015-16 Budget

2016-17 Adopted

2017-18 Projected

Actual

Expenditures:

Personnel Costs

3,966,506 5,304,633

3,961,811 5,524,142

4,146,261 5,594,924

4,274,666 5,605,207

Maintenance & Operations

Capital Outlay

0

0

0

0

Total

9,271,139

9,485,953

9,741,185

9,879,873

Total FTE Positions

59.956

58.456

59.426

59.426

Revenues:

Fines and Forfeitures State Maint. Fees License & Permits

1,009,074

1,235,000

950,000 707,000 60,000 64,800

950,000 707,000 60,000 64,800

723,253 49,085 71,902

707,000 77,000 57,800

All Other

Subtotal

1,853,314 7,417,825

2,076,800 7,409,153

1,781,800 7,959,385

1,781,800 8,098,073

General Fund Contribution

Total

9,271,139

9,485,953

9,741,185

9,879,873

BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS  The FY 16-17 Adopted Budget is increasing by $255,232, or 2.7%.

 An enhancement of $75,000 was added to the GDOT Street Lighting budget in FY 16-17 to cover increasing utility costs and the additional cost of LED lighting as Mercury Vapor lights are replaced by Duke Energy.  A Department Programs Technician was transferred from Police as part of a reorganization resulting in an increase of 1 FTE.  The reduction of 0.03 FTEs is due to the cost reallocation of an Office Assistant position that is shared between three departments.

97